We have probably 150 users in the environment and their roles vary from being application management folks to application engineering folks to the executive suite, so lots of different use cases.
Splunk logo windows#
When you think about how much time you spend working with other applications, just Windows Server requires more feeding than Splunk does, you see that Splunk is a very low maintenance care and feeding product. What do I think about the stability of the solution?Īt least in our environment, it is super stable. I have been using Splunk for probably 10 years. Even though we do get some discounts in most of the cloud space providers, it is still not on par with the big public businesses.Ħ04,760 professionals have used our research since 2012. It's another thing when you're a nonprofit educational institute to spend that kind of money in the cloud. It's one thing for a Fortune 50 company to spend a million dollars a year in the cloud. It seems like they are so focused on forcing everyone into the cloud that they seem to be not understanding that there are people that don't have those really deep pockets.
Splunk logo software#
I'm going to spend X amount of money on hardware every X years, and I'm going to have to pay licensing costs on software of X over that same period versus that amount that I'd amortize over five years is what I would be paying every year in the cloud. The cost for me to buy equipment every three years and own licensing and run it local to my prem, is significantly less from a three or five year license. Splunk's mission is to move everyone to the cloud and charge us a bunch more money. Their goal is to cloud source everything, and quite honestly, the price of cloud sourcing the product, even at smaller 500 gigs a day (which isn't a lot of data by Splunk standards) in the cloud for that is ludicrous. They seem to be doing a good job of keeping it contemporary from that perspective. I don't really have any feature requests in Splunk's space. Their forwarder management is still kind of split that way. It would be nice if they could move all of the administrative features into a GUI platform so that when you're in the Splunk distributed environment management platform, you then don't have to go into the command line to add new applications or new packages that you then want to be able to push out to your forwarders. So it's not all in the GUI, but it has been moving slowly to the GUI over the last several versions. By less kludgy, I mean that in the version I'm running, I still have to go into the command line and modify files and then go into the GUI and validate that they got modified. I still think there are some administrative features that they could improve on and make them less kludgy, but from a user perspective, it has gotten very clean and very sexy looking over the last few builds. Splunk has been improving consistently over the last couple of revs.
Splunk logo license#
We have about a 500 gig license with Splunk, so it's not like petabytes of data, but even 500 gigs is kind of hard to sift through sometimes. The feature that I have found most valuable with Splunk is the ability to sift through a bunch of data very quickly. Splunk has provided a venue for us to determine student engagement during COVID, for which we didn't really have any other way except by looking at data that we captured off of our student systems and our authentication servers to see who's logging in, and who's logging out, and for how long they've been logged in. We're also using it for various application use cases around identity management, windows active directory, and those types of use cases. We are using Splunk in the standard information security use case. "The pricing model is expensive and a nightmare based on the amount of data.".If I was suggesting something, I would probably suggest Splunk because it is better to pay a little bit more and get a lot more." Kibana was more reasonable, but you get more with Splunk. "I remember Splunk being relatively affordable.Once you've got that, you're kind of defeating the purpose because you're going to have to scale back." When you start using it as a central aggregator and you're pumping tons of logs at it, pretty soon, you'll start hitting your cap on what it can process a day. Instead of the full-blown features, if they can narrow the scope where it can only be used for a specific purpose, it would kind of create that market for the product, and it may help with the costing. If they're able to create scaled-down niche or custom package offerings, it may help with the cost. Its cost model is based on how much data it processes a day. "It can be cost-prohibitive when you start to scale and have terabytes of data.
0 kommentar(er)
